O
Emmet County
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

Storage-use text amendment

Emmet County

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (2)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
4
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Apr 9, 2026.

Public comments (4)

OpposedPaul MooradianApr 9, 2026

A 37-year storage operator who opposes the amendments as taking away property rights; questioned the minimum lot size, disputed saturation claims with doors-based math, and asked for extended dialogue on the topic.

Planning Commission - Apr 9, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedJohn GilmourApr 9, 2026

U-Haul Northern Michigan's president said operators feel targeted, cited private traffic studies showing low impact (~50 cars/day at an 800-unit site), and invited commissioners to tour the Traverse City facility — asking for a seat on any committee.

Planning Commission - Apr 9, 2026 · 0:00 →
NeutralRoss MaundersApr 9, 2026

Said aesthetics and location matter most for multi-story storage buildings — fine in commercial areas like M-119, unwelcome near homes — and noted they generate relatively little traffic.

Planning Commission - Apr 9, 2026 · 0:00 →
SupportiveNate HallApr 9, 2026

A small business owner who appreciates the work being done, is at peace with the direction, and wants the public informed so multi-level facilities can't slip through loopholes.

Planning Commission - Apr 9, 2026 · 0:00 →